Emotionality
Structure gives you a functioning scene. Values give it consequence. But neither guarantees the only thing the ...
Structure gives you a functioning scene. Values give it consequence.
But neither guarantees the only thing the reader actually cares about - feeling something.
Without that, the rest is irrelevant. The reader disengages. Not because the writing is wrong, but because it’s empty.
According to Tim Grahl, emotionality is what closes that gap. It’s where you move from constructing the scene to inhabiting it. Out of analysis, into sensation.
The process is simple but not easy.
First, decide the emotional target. Not vaguely but precisely. Dread, anger, desire, relief. One dominant signal. If you can’t name it, you can’t transmit it. (If you’re unsure, reduce the scope. Use something like a feelings wheel and stay at the outer edge. Think clear, distinct emotions, not abstractions.
Second, locate it in your own experience. Find the moment where that emotion was at its strongest in you. Not an idea of it but the lived version. Sit in it long enough for the details to return. Texture, timing, physical response.
Third, write from that state. Not about it. From it.
Every choice on the page - verb, noun, rhythm, detail - should carry the same emotional charge.
Setting, dialogue, description. All of it aligned to the emotionality, all of it doing the same work.
This is where most scenes fail. Not because the writer doesn’t understand structure.
Because they never fully cross over into the feeling they’re trying to create.